Archive for the ‘Society and Culture’ Category

Fifty years ago today, I sat in front of our small, portable black & white television set – the only one we owned – and with my father’s camera, took photographs of the screen.


It was a day like none before it and none since. In some way, all of humanity changed all at once; and together the hearts and minds of the whole population of Earth changed for the better. Together, in the midst and because of a single human endeavor, we were lifted higher. And we felt good.

Think of it. The one, singular event that brought Mankind together in agreement, in joyful fascination and thankful appreciation for something that WE created, chose to do, decided the risk was worth it, and accomplished  ~ this amazing thing that we had never been certain of before.

That year the Earth’s population was 3.61 billion. The United States’ population was 202.7 million.

Somewhere between 600 and 650 million people watched Neil Armstrong place the first human footprint on the Moon. In my memory I was alone, watching this amazing event unfold.

After my Dad had the pictures developed (remember, it took a week or so to get them back from Martin’s Photo Shop), I was excited to create my own little book. I shuffled them into the right order of events, and stapled them together.



(Today I searched easily in YouTube for the video files of the very broadcast I was watching that day in 1969. I sat at my study desk and watched with renewed fascination the video that I snapped my pictures of fifty years ago. I compared the neckties of Walter Cronkite and Wally Schirra to make sure it was the same. I compared the countdown clock superimposed on the screen. I compared the camera angle of the view of the Saturn V from the gantry. It was. Remarkable.)




The primary purpose was simple, as NASA put it. “To put Man on the Moon.” Then Walter Cronkite spoke those words just about an hour before the Saturn V lifted off on launch day. Man. Not “a man”, but “Man”. Meant to represent ALL OF US. And at the time, I have no doubt we all believed it did.

I think virtually everyone from that day on, perhaps until recently, understood and accepted “Mankind”, which was meant to represent all humankind. Not hard to understand and not controversial. But every human endeavor is evolutionary in some way, and so, eventually, even perhaps our language. But not only that, but also our beliefs, our sensitivities, our definitions, our proclivities, our wishes, and desires, and on and on.

In recent years, too, Neil Armstrong’s words at that moment have been given more and more attention. Whether he said “Man” or “a man”.

Personally, I have no doubt as to his exact words; it is clear to me. But beyond that, it is of no significant consequence. It is, however, of great consequence that he spoke the words, but only of incidental interest to me beyond this. But I now have a greater concern that, by the way, I have yet to hear raised. That is the simple and undisputable fact that he said, “Man.”

I am concerned now, because of recent events concerning the acceptance or rejection of history. Will his word, or words be deemed morally wrong, unacceptable, being gender-specific? Will they be wiped, deleted, changed? Will it be taught to children that Armstrong should not have spoken those particular words? That it was immoral and insensitive?




Do not be tempted to think this conclusion would be outrageous, a bridge too far.

Tam Sawyer’s and Huck Finn’s words have been deemed by The New Judges of Society as not only unacceptable, but now unprintable. Even though Samuel Clemens himself explained that just the right words are important, as they convey meaning, time, place, experience, and life as it was during that time, his very words have been changed.

Washington and Jefferson founded our Nation, but they owned slaves, so they are being removed, no longer acceptable nor respectable. It appears they too, may someday be deemed unmemorable. In the opinions of some, Lincoln didn’t fight publicly enough nor vigorously enough for blacks or against slavery, and his likenesses have been destroyed.

And what of our language?

The city of Berkeley, California will soon officially ban gender-specific words.

What if a city employee or anyone walking down the street utters such a word? Will they be fired, accosted, fined, beaten? Will a crowd gather and ridicule or attack them and beat and kick them all in the name of anti-fascism and equality and fairness? Would anyone today be naïve enough to say, “that would never happen”?

Robert E Lee fought for the Confederacy, but more than that, he fought for Virginia. Virginia was a slave state. After the war he was asked to serve as and accepted post of President of Washington College. That college became Washington and Lee University soon after Lee’s death in 1870. The school now continues to endure the pressures of evolution, such as the removal of a Confederate battle flag from the Lee Chapel, when black students in 2014 said the school was unwelcoming. Yes, a name change – of course – has been recommended by some.

It appears that those who are most troubled by the existence of some realities of our history have concluded the resolution is to remove and discard that history. But there is a fair warning to all those who wish to do so: You do so at your own peril. If you advocate that it be done to any one of your fellow citizens, you will likely be next.

History is very much established by evidence – it is the preserved record of past events and realities. If all evidence of the past is destroyed or otherwise put away, then it can eventually be denied altogether. Imagine, someday, someone will say, “The indigenous peoples of this continent were mistreated.” Or “Slavery was a terrible reality of the early United States.” Or “The men who led the armies of the South were morally wrong.” Or “The founders of our country were slave owners.”

And the response may someday be, “Prove it.” And there would be no proof, because the evidence – the historical record – would be no more.

Will this happen to Neil Armstrong?

Will his words be found to be hateful, exclusionary, too gender-specific to be acceptable and therefore changed to be all-inclusive? Will future children be taught they mustn’t speak that way? Will those words with particular intent be banned? Outlawed? Or must they be wiped from the historical record and all human experience? And where does the First Amendment come in? No matter. If we dispose of the evidence, it can all be denied. Where is the proof, afterall? Do not rule it out.

“Free at last, free at last. History has been revised, the record has been swept clean, the proof is no more. The Oppressors themselves have finally been set free.”


I hope that Neil Armstrong’s words remain as they were spoken fifty years ago, but I worry that someone will decide they are wrong now, so they were wrong then.

I guess in my innocence of that day and time when I was not quite eight years old, it was simpler. Today, I am trying to keep it simple. Just remembering and celebrating one of the single greatest achievements of Mankind, in all of human history. Fifty years ago today.




I wrote about this a few years ago, not imagining that our historical statues and busts, even those of Washington and Jefferson and Lincoln, let alone Lee and Jackson, would be outlawed.  Certainly not considering seriously that some words we might choose would be officially banned and we would be scorned as hateful at worst and insensitive at best, all without regard for intent. I wrote about changing history for the sake of some sensitivities of today. It seems that perhaps the destruction of historical things will be eclipsed and the destruction itself will become the historical event. Little did I know how we would evolve.

Here are a couple of my related pieces:

Reading, Hearing, Understanding and Changing History and Ourselves

The Washington Redskins: What’s in a Name?

More reading on this and related subjects:

To Make It to the Moon, Women Have to Escape Earth’s Gender Bias, New York Times

Did we mishear Neil Armstrong’s famous first words on the Moon?

The audio of Armstrong’s first words on the Moon at full speed and half speed

NYT, WaPo Recall Racism, Sexism at NASA in 1960s: Saturday marks 50th anniversary of first moonwalk

Suit to purge ‘under God’ from pledge is over

Remove “Under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance

Is it right to destroy monuments over our dark past?

Vandals Are Destroying Monuments Because They’ve Been Taught To Hate America

Buddhas of Bamyan and their destruction by the Taliban

Ancient Sites Damaged and Destroyed by ISIS

Apollo 11 Launch, CBS



Read Full Post »

Hey old man! No doubt you’re still kicking. Very happy 57th to you!

I’m traveling with Jace this week, but when I get home, in your honor I will have a cup of coffee in the State High coffee mug you gave me.

You won’t believe it . . . I actually had a dream with you in it, either last night or the night before. Seeing the reminder about your birthday pop up on my calendar must’ve got my brain going. It was pretty vague, but I remember you and I were both adults and just walking around talking. That sounds about right. The philosophers.

I am in Hays, Kansas with Jace this morning.

We flew into Kansas City yesterday, drove to visit Hesston College – one of several he has been accepted to in Kansas alone – then on to here to visit Fort Hays State University today.

You probably didn’t know, but our former leader of Indiana State University, Dr. Alan  Rankin, went to Fort Hays College. Turns out, he was a classmate and probably a student activities competitor with Kerri‘s uncle, John Willcoxon, Her dad’s older brother. He would’ve been 104 in July.

After college here, he went to work in Topeka then joined the war effort and became a B-24 pilot.

Before enlisting, he was a top performer in everything he did. He was president of the junior Jaycees, a Boy Scout volunteer, volunteer at the Methodist church, and had a great reputation in his job, moving up quickly getting established in the Topeka business and social communities. He also began taking flying lessons.

He wrote a beautiful and moving and confident letter to his parents when he decided to volunteer for the Army Air Corps. He eventually made it to Papua New Guinea with Col. Rogers and the 90th Bomb Group where he was made operations officer even as a young lieutenant; pretty impressive, and apparently a good pilot too. Eventually he volunteered for a mission he was not required to fly in that position, but they had not been able to destroy a bridge that had been on the target list for quite a long time.

He volunteered to take a shot at it and was successful. As they returned to base, he and his crew were attacked by perhaps a dozen Japanese fighters, shooting down several before his plane exploded. Only two survivors. John’s body and several others were not recovered. Sad but proud history in her family.


Back to Rankin and Fort Hays, Newspaper accounts mention both in student government and seemed indicate they would’ve been two of the top guys in their class, high marks in academics, very involved and vying for leadership positions on campus.

I often think about how well Kerri’s dad did in his professional life and what Dr. Rankin achieved in his career becoming a university president, and I, like everyone in the family believe that John would’ve done even more beyond his contribution to the war effort as well. I suppose we all feel a sense of sadness about what might’ve been, but take great pride in his accomplishments and who he was as a person.

Almost 2 years ago, when Jace and I took a 4700 mile road trip, from Colorado to Indiana to Canada to West Yellowstone and back to Colorado, we made our first stop at Fort Hays State. We went to the student union where we found a memorial to students who have been lost in the various wars, John among them. It was a touching moment, two generations and life-times beyond, but very directly connected, not only to that spot at that school, but the family farm where John and his brother, Sam – Jace’s grandfather – grew up just a few hours away.

Now this nearly 2 years later, Jace and I are in that very spot again and he has been accepted in that very school, along with KU where his grandparents attended. We all feel a real sense of connection and pride, as you can imagine.


So in just a couple of hours, Jace will tour the Fort Hays State University campus and will have more to add to his decisions! (Then on to KU and more decisions and pressures tomorrow!)

Anyway, happy birthday! That’s your birthday inspiration story for the day.

Do something special and different today.

Love to you, Brother.


Read Full Post »

Holy Land, Whose Land?

Modern Dilemma, Ancient Roots

Dr. Dorothy W. Drummond

From Amazon.com: “Dorothy Drummond [was] an educator, speaker, and world traveler. A former president of the National Council for Geographic Education, she has authored four textbooks on world cultures and has traveled widely in the Middle East.”


Dr. Dorothy Drummond was my Mother’s closest friend, and for the past four years they have been traveling companions, across the country and around the world.

Mother, Dorothy and Mao

Mother’s caption: “The three of us”, China, late Nov 2018

It was on their most recent trip – to China – that Dorothy sustained a fall and a severe head injury and passed away in a Hong Kong hospital with her eldest daughter and my Mother at her side. In fact, as of the moment of this writing, Friday, December 7, they have not yet been able to return home. Dying in another country – so far from home – is exponentially more painful and China, even Hong Kong, is no exception and fraught with exceptional difficulties.

It has been an indescribably sad and stressful experience losing her, and for Mother and Dorothy’s daughter, including for those of us who have had to lend all the emotional and practical support we possibly could across the vast distance. We anxiously await their return home and will continue to grieve with them for  some time to come.

Dr. Drummond was full of vitality and vigor and would have been 90 years young on December 19, 2018. For she and my Mother, there was apparently not even the slightest thought of not continuing to travel world-wide and around the United States; they simply went constantly and would have continued to do so until… who knows? For all of we family members and their friends, we knew nothing other than another trip being planned.

Mother and Dorothy, Iceland Nov 5 2017

Traveling in Iceland, November 2017

It would be almost impossible for me to adequately further describe Dorothy’s life, their friendship, the breadth and intensity of their adventures together, and notably, Dorothy’s most widely and deeply recognized and respected, incredible and singularly unique professional life.

She was a professor of geography, a researcher, an author, a lecturer, a teacher of and advocate for children, one of the foremost authorities of her field, recognized globally in her academic expertise; and perhaps she might say more than anything else professionally, a student, a voracious and eternal learner.

Beyond her professional life she was a wife, a mother, a deeply committed member of St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church of Terre Haute, a serious and most articulate political and social activist, a fighter against hunger, a dedicated volunteer, and a most devoted friend. And Mother was – and remains even at this very hour – with her every step of the way.

These descriptions I have assembled here do not adequately tell her story. Se was extraordinary and she was loved.

Dorothy in Iceland

To read more about Dorothy, her other books and where you might get them, and their final trip together, please follow these several links below. And in honor of Dr. Dorothy Drummond and significantly to honor why she wrote this and her other books, please read Holy Land Whose Land?


From the Terre Haute Tribune-Star: ‘She walked purposefully through life’

From Valparaiso University, Dorothy’s alma mater

From the Terre Haute Tribune-Star: Mark Bennett: Dorothy Drummond helped others understand the world a little better

From DirectionsMag.com: GeoInspirations: Dorothy Drummond, the Never Stop Learning and Traveling Educator

Dorothy Drummond – IUPUI ScholarWorks (pdf download)

From the Journal of Geography: Citation for Dorothy Drummond 2010 Recipient of the George J. Miller Award for Distinguished Service

– – –


As of late Sunday afternoon, Dec 9, 2018 my mother and Dorothy Drummond’s eldest daughter, Kathleen carrying Dorothy’s remains, had safely returned to Indiana after nearly 20 hours of travel from Hong Kong directly to Chicago then on to Indianapolis. Mother and Kathy are talking about traveling to India in 2019 to continue the plans already made, and continuing their new-found companionship asking, “What would Dorothy do?”


As of February 7, Mother and Kathleen were on their way to India. They have been staying with family friend in and around Mumbai, experiencing the hot and humid days and nights, and hot and tasty local food, the sights and sounds, touring and living. A remarkable story of carrying on.


– – –

– – –

– – –

Read Full Post »

What To Do Next


The country is calling for action against gun violence in schools, and rightly so.

While there is no perfect solution, there are clearly things that can be done that too widely, have not been. Yes, they are expensive and many have argued prohibitively so; they may be intrusive and restrictive and again, in some places, unreasonably so. We know this. We know the arguments on both sides, on all sides. So while we all do not agree on all the specifics, it is safe to say we all agree something more, different, new, effective must be done. It is also understood that security measures for secondary schools will not necessarily work for primary schools.

My decision to write this was ultimately driven by the expressions of two of my relatives who are school teachers. While we – or any two of us anywhere – may have differing political or philosophical views I am confident we all agree on the most important things: Keeping our children, our schools, safe.

At the risk of embarrassing myself, leaving out something obvious or promoting something objectionable, or offending someone in any possible way and very possibly sounding foolish, ill-informed or uneducated, here’s my list. Unquestioningly it will be found (or accused) to be disagreeable, incomplete, naive, short-sighted, too far-reaching, or possibly just unrealistic or ineffective, missing the mark. Whatever solutions are implemented anywhere, I do firmly believe our constitutional rights, freedoms and constraints – vital to all US citizens – can still be protected.

Following the list, I have provided links to each of my previous writings related to this subject. This is my attempt to share my comprehensive, in fact all-encompassing perspective. As far as my perspective on this subject, I want to emphasize that my position, which is a complicated one, cannot be fully understood nor placed in the completely proper context without the benefit (or burden) of reading all the relevant articles I have written. In short, if you don’t read all of it, you will miss something and will not be fully informed as to my position. Criticize me or thank me, or perhaps you’ll just want to go to sleep at the thought of reading my stuff; I promise I have left nothing on the table. For the record, this collection, as faulty or incomplete as it may be, is my full “say”.

Ultimately, it is my hope that many other people in positions to take action, enact changes and people much smarter than me, are doing the same thing and more of it.

– – –

1. Absolute enforcement of relevant laws already in place.

2. Improve background investigations and their processes, including intelligence sharing across federal, state and local agencies.

3. Enact or improve legislation that allows for crisis and pre-crisis intervention and improves information sharing between law enforcement agencies and relevant healthcare providers, all while still protecting individual rights and privacy.

4. Correct law enforcement agency mistakes and deficiencies in procedures and responses, including those proactive and preemptive. In relation to the shooting in Broward County, Florida, the FBI and local agencies had multiple and gross lapses, failures in multiple areas and multiple times. I believe disciplinary action against authorities on all levels is probably warranted in the Florida case. Ensure that responding security officers immediately and aggressively confront and neutralize threats.

5. Improve reporting programs to encourage appropriate reporting. Many school districts have extensive and multi-layered programs, including one aspect called Text-a-Tip, implemented in Douglas County, Colorado.

6. Electro-mechanically operated doors.

7. Video-monitored entry points and approaches to entry points. Monitoring to be active and constant.

8. Electronic access and identification cards required for secondary students and school staff and faculty; “proximity” badges or similar technology to actuate building entry; single person entry procedures (“tailgating” prohibited and actively controlled for entry). Cards are activated and deactivated electronically and remotely. All appropriate authorities are notified when an access or “prox” card is deactivated or revoked.

9. Armed security present at all active entry points and far ends of building approaches (closest to parking areas). Video surveillance of parking areas.

10. Random and specifically-defined mandatory searches conducted.

11. Secure portal entry areas – double electro-mechanically controlled door sets with metal detectors between. Portals are instantly locked inside and out upon detection (sensor activation) to contain and prevent further movement.

12. For entry outside of start- and end-of-day access (normally scheduled time window) active video assessment and audio communication capability installed at all access points and required before access is granted. Example: remote search/observation of backpack or satchel.

13. Separate portal for special entry requirements.

14. More prominent and permanent law enforcement presence, such as routine patrols, school building or on-property substations to be established.

15. Full-time armed school resource/security officer staffing. Utilize highly-qualified retired and former civilian and military law enforcement personnel and other highly trained and qualified individuals.

16. Modified procedures be implemented for security at athletic and other after-school-hours activities.

Here’s what it could look like, at least in part:

How an Indiana school protects against mass shootings as the 'safest school in America'

The Jeremy Wright Athletic Complex at Southwestern High School in Shelbyville, Ind. The school has been referred to as “the safest school in America” since a 2015 “Today Show” report on the school’s security program. (Photo: The Indianapolis Star)


How an Indiana school protects against mass shootings as the ‘safest school in America’

USA Today Network, Nate Chute and Justin L. Mack, The Indianapolis Star

– – –

– – –

– – –

– – –

– – –

– – –

l_wx3bBJSchool Shooting in Connecticut: An Open Letter to the Indiana Schools Superintendent
December 12, 2014

– – –

– – –

– – –


The Community of Family: It Begins at Home

December 16, 2012

– – –

– – –

The Pain and the Truth of Friday
December 23, 2012Sandy Hook School

– – –

Where Have the Children Gone?
December 23, 2012

– – –

Faulty Philosophy, Ineffective Government: An Analysis of President Obama’s 23 Executive Orders for Gun Control
February 13, 2013

– – –

Read Full Post »

1. Rent, check out at the library, buy, download or get off of the shelf:
Ken Burns’ Jefferson.


Here’s a sample.

2. Choose one:
A. Inspired and hopeful on this Presidents Day? Then Watch and reinforce what you believe.
B. Frustrated and discouraged on this Presidents Day? Then watch and be reassured.

3. Skip the news tonight.

4. Enjoy an inspiring and educational distraction and an incredible soundtrack all at the same time.

5. Thank me later.

BONUS: More from Ken Burns

Ken Burns America
The Roosevelts: An Intimate History
Lewis & Clark: The Journey of the Corps of Discovery
The Congress

Read Full Post »

The man newly elected president is about to be inaugurated.

He has been much opposed and yet, too, much celebrated. Throughout his campaign he promoted controversial positions, especially when it comes to what so many would even call basic human rights; in other ways, he has been demonized for his radical views and proposals – and many argue unsophisticated and untried, inexperienced, even naive perspective. He is in too many ways an unknown quantity and yet is already reviled intensely and in other quarters seen almost as a savior of the country – finally.

Yet, with the fallout from the building troubles and looming destruction (some, perhaps many would say) of society and even the country, and the building storm and the fears of what is surely to come next, he hasn’t even taken office yet.

Yes, he may be loved in many sections of the country, but the greatest publicity surrounding him seems to have been up to this point negative, and many would say rightly so. Fear – or anticipation – of the unknown can be a powerful thing. We as a nation have lived it for as much as a decade, building to this great crescendo; it almost seems to have been inevitable.

It seems we stand literally on the brink of drastic, fantastic change. Change that may shake our security, our confidence in the future. In fact, that is perhaps the one thing we know without doubt: Things will change, we will change as our country, its direction and all affected by it and reliant upon it will change.

And here we are, the very night before his inauguration.

It is March 3rd, 1861.

For better or worse – and who can really tell? – Abraham Lincoln will be sworn into office tomorrow. Truly, if there be a God, surely then we plead, whether in joy, fear or even anger, God help us all.

– – –

That morning in Washington City, one-hundred-fifty-six years ago, it was just as this one is expected to be: cold and rainy.

Our nation was on the verge of tearing itself apart, and so the mood of the skies reflected perfectly the inner-workings of people’s very hearts and minds. Lincoln bore an awesome weight that day, speaking much directly to the citizens of the South and speaking both eloquently and technically of those points of our National Constitution that addressed the issue of slavery, whether directly or indirectly.

Yet he spoke broadly to all the country as well, already feeling the weight of his assumed responsibilities and of the looming future; we could say now, in hindsight, impending doom.

From Lincoln’s first inaugural address:

“. . .In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the Government, while I shall have the most solemn one to “preserve, protect, and defend it.”

“I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.”

– – –

And even with these impassioned, almost pleading words, it was just one month later, April 12th, that the first shots of our Union’s great and devastating Civil War were fired and that eventually took more lives than all other wars in American history combined. In those moments that Lincoln stood on the very steps that the man to assume the office of our 45th President stands now – in those moments, he surely knew what was to come and could not be stopped.

He won the presidency with only 40 percent of the vote; he did not even appear on the ballots of 10 southern states. And when he finally arrived in the capital city after his election, he was under threat of death and came on under the cover of disguise and darkness. And a great war was still and only one month away. Even then he had thoughts, perhaps premonitions of death, even assassination. Yet he was compelled to go forward, to assume the mantle and carry the great burden.

– – –

Only four years later, but perhaps the longest four years in American history, Lincoln being a much older man in his body and spirit than his actual age would reckon, he saw the fulfillment of the promise of a united republic . . . but perhaps only from a distance. Like Moses, who was to only see the Promised Land from a distance, Lincoln too, never saw the fruits of Emancipation or of Reconciliation or of Reconstruction, but he saw them and knew them from a great distance, and believed in the promise that they would someday be realized. And they were.


From his second inaugural address:

“With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

And yet even after this, as before just one month later, on April 15th, great violence was visited upon the nation. In that moment the course of history was both fixed and altered.

Perhaps the very people who would choose not to attend such a momentous occasion as the inauguration of our next President will reflect on the fact that the incalculable sacrifices made those seven score and seventeen years ago afford them even now the liberty to choose such a course freely.


Surely they and we all will reflect on this and celebrate this great thing. Though some, even many, still feel a sense of living under threat for their future, by virtue of the fact that they live under these Stars and Stripes and are both bounded by and set free by our Constitution, there remains the hope for and promise of a better future.

And for each and everyone of us as individuals, perhaps if we try hard enough, we will remember that “. . . we are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.”

– – –

– – –

Lincoln photo: last known photo of Lincoln
President-elect Donald Trump photo credit: Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Trump photo source: Article, IT’S OFFICIAL: The Electoral College makes Trump the president-elect, by Rebecca Harrington, for Business Insider

Read Full Post »

Oct 27th 7:13pm

ExPatTex: Hey, I just had to check in and see what conclusions you have drawn about the election? I’m not going to harass you if we disagree (when have we ever agreed?), but I’d like to know what your take is.


Oct 30th 8:59pm

ExPatCO: I have voted and am now living under a rock.

ExPatTex: Yes. I can understand 😦 This hasn’t been a stellar year for decency. I hope we can heal from this. I’m concerned about how polarized our country is, and the level to which our public discourse has fallen. Even I quit talking about politics; it’s just too painful. It used to be fun to disagree, but not so much this time around.

Oct 31st 3:52pm

ExPatCO: Agreed. Ok, here’s my [final] prediction: I believe it could actually turn out to be a Trump landslide, similar to Reagan – I have heard (don’t remember, of course…) that Carter was up high in single and low double-digit points in polling in the last days and even hours before, then all crashed on him. Just as much, I believe it could be a very tight squeaker late into the night, and no way to predict well. The one thing I believe impossible is a Clinton landslide.

More importantly, I think of what my father-in-law wrote in his first family history book (Kansas family farm stuff): In one of the chapters he wrote about the some of the darkest days of the farm in the seventies. He entitled it, “The Sun Will Still Come Up in the Morning”, quoting his father. I think of that constantly, and think that’s why he seems so well able to weather all this.

No matter what turns out, it is true: the sun really will rise again in the morning.

I think also of that Facebook group, “We Survived Bush, You Will Survive Obama”. The new group will be “We Survived Bush-then Obama-then ???-???- and on and on and on. . . .” until my son and then my son’s kids are old people.

… So… let’s both go back and re-read the Book of Ecclesiastes: There is Nothing New Under the Sun. Did that answer your Q?!

Oct 31st 5:26pm

ExPatTex: I have no doubt that there is nothing new under the sun. When GWB was elected I accepted the choice of the people. I decided he was a compassionate man, as he portrayed himself. I was so disappointed with that man. The financial wreckage left behind, and the results, to this day, of the wars that we needlessly engaged in.

I think I’ve lost the optimism that allowed me to believe that it doesn’t really matter who resides in the White House. The sun will rise in the morning, but what will it reveal?

I’m not as good at analysis as you are. I was convinced that Romney would win, although you may have been, too. I just hope that whatever happens, it will be mostly good for most people.

You already owe me an ice cream from the last election. I think you’re holding out until I owe you one.

– – –


Nov 9th 4:13pm

ExPatTex: I would like to believe that we will now pull together behind a man who earns our respect every day. A man who can figure out how to deliver his vague but huge promises.

This completely unexpected outcome holds some lessons if we choose to learn them.

I think our country embraced equality in a way that left many people deeply uncomfortable. Whether we agree or find that reprehensible, maybe we have to face it. When apparently religious people give their tacit approval to a man who has no respect for their principles or values, or even the basic standards of human decency, maybe they’re doing so out of some conviction we just do not understand. Maybe we should try.

We all knew that the election of a black man as President created a huge backlash of racism and resentment that was shocking to those of us who had moved beyond racism. Since this election is partially a reaction to the threat, real or imagined, that some people feel from outsiders, including women and blacks, I expect to see more discrimination and hatred than ever before. It comes from the top down, and the flames are already being fanned. David Duke of the KKK tweeted this morning that DT is their candidate.

If Trump can truly be a leader to all of us, he’s going to have to drop the hate and racism. We would be wise though, to recognize that there are those who found a voice to their stifled feelings in his hurtful remarks. Their feelings aren’t going to go away even if he learns to rein in his hateful opinions; the opinions of his constituency still exist.

I think desperate people who saw their lives disintegrating believe that their fortunes will be better served by burning the country down than any other prospect they feel they have. I think they have no interest in how the US is perceived in the world; they just want their little part of it to get better. If they’re backing the wrong horse, it will still be harder to ignore their decline, and maybe we shouldn’t. Maybe we should have been more attentive to it a long time ago.

I think that many of us believed that Americans were progressing in tolerance. There is a huge segment of us, however, who don’t share those feelings. They seem more comfortable with the idea of single family earners than single parent households. Again, whether we agree or find this bizarre and anachronistic, we need to face their feelings. We have been trying to move along without them, but now their voices have been heard.

This outcome will be dissected every possible way. I hope that we will all choose to learn some lessons, and try to understand one another more. I hope that now we can put this horrible election behind us and move forward with some healing. We owe it to ourselves to do so, rather than to maintain partisanship until we are more damaged by it.

A lot of us didn’t get what we wanted. I’m one of those people. But look at how divided we were: we knew that half of us would be unhappy with the result, whatever it was. Everybody has had their say. If Clinton won, I expected rioting. Maybe we can be a little more restrained in our reactions this way.

There are aspects to the future that horrify me, and fill me with sadness. We will have to face those issues as they come. Right now it’s time to move forward.

Nov 9th 9:02pm

ExPatCO: Ultimately, regarding the highest principles you speak of, I agree with you. For me HRC would have been as unacceptable as DT is/was for you. He was last on my list, except that HRC was last behind him. In my view DT’s horrible stuff does not make HRC’s rotten stuff less so. I can only hope now he has a better nature that will come forth.

It is a true mystery to me how we can see, think, and believe so differently. As humans we are fascinating – how we can be made of the same stuff yet be so different. I don’t think it can really be explained. Perhaps it is random and only but amazingly, wonderfully biological; perhaps it is intentional, deliberate. I do not know.

As for the future, I remain a bit frustrated, cautious and cautiously hopeful.

As for all that you have said here, essentially, and in short, I hope you are right about all the good stuff and wrong about all the bad stuff.

Nov 9th 9:17pm

ExPatTex: I didn’t sleep last night; I was so filled with anxiety. I had plenty of time to think this all through. I’m a pragmatist, and I think we’d better make every attempt we can to understand one another. The election was so adversarial that we told ourselves that those who supported the candidate we did not were crazy.

We’d better take this moment to look a little deeper, or we are going to tear our nation apart. I don’t have to agree, but I want to understand.

Nov 9th 10:30pm

ExPatCO: Agreed. And I have completely lost track of who owes whom ice cream.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Audrey Williams

Humanitarian. Pianist. Cellist. Teacher. Music Creator. Engineer


Notes from a Global Nomad


The Rise and Decline of a Small Town

Art Out The Wazoo

"There is no art without contemplation." - Robert Henri

Southern Indiana Agitator

Jeffersonville's Kelley Curran on politics, the media and more

Featherheart's Weblog

a place of poetry and photography

The Deep Friar

Digging a hole. And filling it up again.

Shannon A Thompson

Young Adult Science Fiction and Fantasy Author

Prego and the Loon

Pregnant and Dealing With Domestic Violence

Double Agent

The website of Steve Robert Simmons offering selected writings and personal essays. [Painting: "The Winding Road" by T. C. Steele (1907)]

%d bloggers like this: